Say what you will about Tom Cruise (and there’s an awful lot that could be said). For me, his name has always been synonymous with, “entertaining.” For all his shortcomings, including his inability/refusal to incorporate appropriate accents and his wackadoo personal life, he makes wholly entertaining movies. From Top Gun to Knight and Day, he has put together a three decade-long career that is chock full of thrilling excitement. You can’t always say that his films are good but very rarely can you deny the man his ability to enthrall the masses. Ghost Protocol, then, serves as a return to form and a pronouncement to the man’s detractors that Tom Cruise is still a force to be reckoned with.
At the outset, we find Ethan Hunt (Tom Cruise) locked
away in a Russian prison. Within minutes (really seconds), however, his old pal
Benji (Simon Pegg) and newcomer Jane (Paula Patton) have busted him out in
order for Hunt to resume his duties at IMF. He and his team immediately take on
a new assignment that unfortunately goes quite bad, resulting in their being
framed for the bombing of the Kremlin. Having been disavowed by the US government,
the trio, along with the help of William Brandt (Jeremy Renner), an analyst
with a mysterious past, is forced to go on the run, one step ahead of Russian
operatives who would see them brought to justice. In an effort to both clear
their names and, you know, save the world and all, Hunt and his comrades pursue
Alex Hendricks (Michael Nyqvist), a nuclear extremist bent on destroying
civilization as we know it, using a variety of elaborate and frantic methods in
a host of exotic locations.
As an action movie junkie, I have a healthy respect for
two of the previous three Mission:
Impossible films. The first M:I
is the prototypical mid-‘90s action flick, smarter than what we were treated to
in the ‘80s but not quite intelligent enough to fit our standards in a post-Inception world. M:I2 is a heap of rubbish, plain and simple. From a plot
standpoint, M:I3 is the best of the
group and it’s a movie I quite like though I believe I am in the
minority. Even still, the Mission:
Impossible franchise has long been just another set of action movies that
blends together with a host of other acceptable-to-above-average entertaining
exhibitions in special effects.
Ghost Protocol
is different, however. MUCH different. This is the very rare sequel to a sequel
to a sequel that is by far and without question, the best of the group (see
also: Fast Five). No longer can this
series be relegated to the overcrowded ranks of “fun-but-forgettable” action
flicks. Ghost Protocol is a clever
cross between Bourne and Bond with a touch of cool intelligence
that is reminiscent of Ocean’s 11. This
is a much smarter film than the average action movie, much of which should be
attributed to director Brad Bird (Incredibles).
“Smart” should not be confused with “complex” or “real”; Ghost Protocol has more than its fair share of plot points that
could be blasted for inaccuracies and absurd stunts that could never, ever
happen. But these potential issues are presented in such an overwhelmingly
appealing way that it seems foolish to quibble when it’s so much easier to just
get on board. The gadgets and technologies used by the team are better than
anything James Bond ever had at his disposal and each item is used splendidly. In
essence, this is a popcorn blockbuster with a Pixar brain, which turns out to
be just as glorious as it sounds.
From the opening shot, Ghost Protocol moves a mile a minute and delivers some of the most
ambitious action sequences of the year. The impact of this movie goes deeper
than the outlandish stunts, however. It would be easy to film what will
undoubtedly be an awesome scene and leave it at that. But Bird and his crew
take these shots to a whole new level with impeccable technical work. The
cinematography and shot selection are about as good as you can ask for in a
blockbuster. Some of the camera work, especially the scenes in Dubai, is
absolutely stunning. Likewise, the sound mix is perfect, adding to the impact
of each gun shot, car crash, and punch to the jaw. These elements serve to put
the audience into the heart of the action and give the impression that Bird
cared about creating a great film not just a passable popcorn flick.
The supporting cast around Cruise rounds into form
nicely, coming together to make up Hunt’s best team yet. Pegg’s brand of
comedic relief is predictable but nonetheless enjoyable and he displays a
little more grit than he has in the past. Patton is a welcome addition and she
brings real value to her role, the rare female action hero who actually carries her
weight. This is what I think Zoe Saldana is supposed to be and I look forward
to seeing more of her in the future. And then, of course, there’s Renner who plays
slightly against type and, while he’s certainly not reinventing the wheel, he
displays enough quiet power behind his character’s lack of confidence to make
his role work very well.
But Ghost Protocol
goes nowhere without a strong lead and Cruise is more than up to the challenge.
I have always been a serious fan of the man and I feel like he’s gotten an
unfair shake over the last half-decade or so. What I have always appreciated about
Cruise is his earnest desire to make his movies great (whether he succeeds or not). A buddy of mine hit the nail on
the head regarding Cruise when he said that he always tries really hard. Every movie, every scene, every shot,
Cruise strives to make it the best he’s ever done. I think he truly cares about
his films in a way that most movie stars do not. Ghost Protocol is no exception as Cruise goes after every scene like
it’s the one that will bring home an Oscar. For me, it is this commitment to
the moment that sells Ghost Protocol as
more than just a run-of-the-mill action movie and makes it one of the most
deliciously appealing, wonderfully entertaining, and decidedly
multi-dimensional films of the year.
You knew they would succeed with an Avenger on board.
ReplyDeleteMy only complaint is that we only got one mask pull-off. My favorite thing in Mission: Impossible movies. :)
ReplyDeleteMakes me want to see this one.
ReplyDeleteditto on everything you said in this great review (except for your 'misplaced' affection for MI-3!) :P
ReplyDeletehaha!
Glad you enjoyed it so much. It really is a great sequel of a sequel of a sequel!
Very nice review!
@John, you love science, ha!
ReplyDelete@Emily, yeah, Simon Pegg was BEGGING for more masks, too!
@Talmid, I think you'd enjoy it.
@SS, I just replaced my MI3 DVD with a Blu-Ray. Does that make it worse?
MI4 is such a refreshing movie with new dimensions in stunts.. be it burj kalifa scenes, sandstorm chase, satellite entry by jeremy, multilevel parking, car bombed with imf ppl inside etc etc.. outstanding work and the director managed to keep the stunts scenes pouring in at regular intervals so there is no boredom strike during the entire 2.15 hr period.. this may not be the best, but certainly a movie of this year.. im sure indian soap lovers will find this movie an average performer
ReplyDeletehaha. B! That does make it worse. hahah. I just traded my copy in! for store credit! LOL
ReplyDelete