Larry Crowne (Tom Hanks)
is a long-time floor manager of a Wal-Mart-like superstore who happens to love
his job. Due to the recession, however, his company begins downsizing redundant
employees and because of Larry’s lack of a college education, he soon finds
himself without a job. In order to make himself more marketable, he registers
for some classes at a local community college. Here he meets a set of new
friends, led by Talia (Gugu Mbatha-Raw) and Dell Gordo (Wilmer Valderrama), who
share his passion for scooters and who attempt to revamp his image. He also meets
Mercedes Tainot (Julia Roberts), an alcoholic speech teacher in a failing
marriage and an even less fulfilling job. The two strike up an awkward
friendship that ultimately benefits them both in this story of revitalization
and renewal in the face of adversity.
First off, I love Tom
Hanks and Julia Roberts. At one time or another, I would have listed them both
as my favorite actor and actress respectively. Hanks is the classic All
American Actor, the guy you root for at all times and who seems to genuinely
understand his massive appeal. Roberts is the female version of Hanks, the
beautiful girl next door who’s managed to remain a fan favorite for 20 years in
an industry that forgets women the second they turn 35. I am always happy to
see either of them on screen (unless it involves “The Da Vinci Code”) and
despite the dip in productivity that each have experienced over the last
decade, they can still get me out to a theater based solely on their names. I
have long believed that you can’t make either of these great actors unlikable.
Well, I was wrong.
“Larry Crowne” is an
absolute disaster in every sense of the word. None of these characters are in
the least bit relatable or likeable. Tainot is an awful old bat that I pretty
much hated the moment she stepped on screen. I’m all for a good redemption
story and I understand that you have to start low to make the high more
significant, but if this character had been hit by a bus in the tenth minute, I
would have been fine. Larry himself is so thoroughly hapless that I just couldn’t
bring myself to invest in him despite the numerous times my brain told me, “Come
on dude, that’s Tom Hanks! You’ve got to love his character! It’s just a rule.”
He is a painful mix of Forrest Gump (my least favorite Hanks film until now)
and the kid from “Big” that comes across as wholly unbelievable. No one is this
naïve. No one. The rest of the cast, which includes George Takei, Cedric the
Entertainer, and Rob Riggle, ranges from totally worthless (Pam Grier) to
cringe-worthy and one dimensional (Bryan Cranston, how in the name of “Breaking
Bad” did you get talked into this role?!). That’s not even mentioning
Mbatha-Raw who probably shouldn’t be allowed to act again. Shockingly,
Valderrama gives the best performance of anyone in the film but in some ways,
isn’t that all I need to say? The foreign dude from “That ‘70s Show” who has
done absolutely nothing else of note in his career is the best part of this
film. Ouch.
All of these retched characters
are nothing, however, compared to the excessively cheery and somewhat pointless
nature of the film’s narrative. There is no real humor in “Larry Crowne”, only
watered-down jokes that might suffice on a middling CBS sitcom but don’t do the
job in a feature film. The overt cheeriness goes hand-in-hand with Larry’s naivety
but as I said before, this naivety is irritating, not endearing. Everyone is
happy all the time (except for Tainot) and as a result there is no depth to the
characters or the story. The events simply play out in front of the helpless
audience instead of bringing them into the story. That’s not always a bad
thing, I guess, but when you’re working with an extremely relevant topic like
job loss, you’re wasting an opportunity to engross the audience. “Crowne”
really doesn’t even make an attempt to do so and that is perhaps its most
egregious offense.
In short, this film has
Nia Vardalos’ fingerprints all over it. IMDB will tell you that Hanks co-wrote “Larry
Crowne” with Vardalos but I don’t believe it for a minute. This mess has
Vardalos’ fingerprints all over it: one note characters, a shallow plot, and abysmal
dialog. That’s all Vardalos has treated us to since “Greek Wedding” scored $350
million at the box office and I was willing to accept that she would always be
involved with horrible movies that I would simply stay away from. But now that
she’s infected the glorious careers of both Tom Hanks and Julia Roberts…well, I
think I’m ready to preserve the greater good and rid the world of “My Big Fat
Greek Wedding” and everyone who had anything to do with it. Since I’m out of
plutonium, however, I’ll just have to implore you, dear readers, to stay away
from “Larry Crowne” and pretend you’ve never heard of Nia Vardalos.
Grade: C-
I never liked that movie
in the first place,
Brian
It's amusing and has it's heart in the right place, it just falls for every single cliche in the book, and features way too many cute moments just for the sake of being a cute moment. Good Review Man!
ReplyDeleteThank you for saving me from this train wreck.
ReplyDelete@Dan, That will from here on out be known as "Pulling a Vardalos."
ReplyDelete@Talmid, you're welcome.