Oh, how I wanted to like this movie. I was intrigued from
the moment I saw the first trailer and while the reviews from last year weren’t
good (at all), I still felt like there was a decent enough chance that I could at
least enjoy this movie for what it is. If nothing else the concept, based on a
true story, holds some value for me and I must admit, I’m a fan of vigilantism,
as deranged as that may sound. Unfortunately, there is almost nothing positive within
Machine Gun Preacher that I could
latch onto. In fact, it’s almost like the makers of this film were going out of
the way to alienate me and I would guess just about anyone else who happened to
sit down for a viewing.
First and foremost, director Marc Forster displays absolutely
no aptitude for subtlety; think of a method in which a movie can attempt to
manipulate one’s emotions and Machine Gun
Preacher probably employs that method. Watching this film is like being
beaten over the head with a hammer; a soft, velvety hammer to be sure but a
hammer nonetheless. I’ve never been one to get up in arms about a movie trying
to invoke emotions but man, a little more respect for the viewer’s ability to
follow along and connect would have been appreciated. Second, the characters
are all horribly one-dimensional and robotic. At times Sam breaks out of his
cage but these moments are few and far between and most of the time all of the
main characters remain rigidly bound to the overly-simplistic, paper-thin
guidelines set out in what I’m assuming is a miserable script. Third, the
performances within MGP are really,
really bad. I’m not sure whether the acting is hamstrung by the wretched
characters or if the characters never get a chance to expand because of the bad
acting, but regardless, these are not portrayals that this cast will wish to
bring up in the future. Even Michael Shannon, one of the greatest, most
underrated actors of his generation, seems completely lost in a role that
perhaps he regretted taking. It’s been quite a run for Shannon of late so I won’t
get up in arms about one lesser performance, especially considering how much
better he is than the lead.
Let it be known that I do like Gerard Butler. I hate
(repeat: HATE) most of the movies he has made since 2007’s 300 but I’ve been willing to cut him some slack based on the fact
that it took him many years to catch his big break and I can’t blame him for
taking a few paycheck roles afterwards. That said, his performance in MGP makes it very hard to defend him.
Much like Forster’s work behind the camera (and perhaps because of it), Butler
seems to be dead set on FORCING the viewer to relate rather than letting the
audience make that choice on their own. To describe his acting as “award
pandering” might be a little strong but it’s not far from the truth. Moreover
(and much more importantly in my book), his accent is legitimately among the
worst I have ever heard. In the beginning of the film, I couldn’t decide if he
was supposed to be American (he is) or if the real-life Sam Childers was
actually Scottish (he isn’t). The accent jumps back and forth, though always
tinted with a twinge of a foreign accent. I could probably forgive that. But things
got much, much worse in the second act when Butler flipped a switch and went into
a BRUTAL southern accent, complete with the dialogue you might expect to get
from an episode of Hee-Haw. Childers
is from Pennsylvania, not the deep south, and even if Butler had mastered the
accent, the dialogue would have still proven unbearable. I’m of the opinion
that if you can’t do the accent, then you just don’t do it. Tom Cruise took
flack for his role in Valkyrie in
which he made no attempt at a German accent but I would much prefer that to
trying an accent and butchering it. Later on Butler seems to have gotten this
memo as he reverts back to the “is he American or not” accent on display
earlier on.
If all of that isn’t enough to keep you from seeing MGP, let me also tell you that the movie
decisively lacks an audience. Often it feels like an overtly Christian film,
brought to you by the studio who gave us Facing
the Giants and Fireproof (films
which I have previously expressed a distaste for despite the shared beliefs I
have with the filmmakers). But then it goes out of its way to separate itself
from those films by allowing Butler to fly off the handle with a flurry of
words that insure MGP will earn its
R-rating. I can’t imagine many of those I go to church with embracing this film
because of the unnecessarily graphic handling of the subject matter; similarly,
I would expect non-churchgoers to bail out based on the cheesy, Kirk Cameron-y
way in which the film is laid out. At the end of the day, this is just simply a
bad movie that does nothing with its worthwhile central story and actually gets
worse the more I think about it.
That's a shame, because the concept explores themes that really interest me.
ReplyDelete