Being Flynn is
based on the memoir of the real-life Nick Flynn, who worked as a social worker
in a Boston homeless shelter in the late ’80s where he ended up under the same
roof as his father. The tale of the Flynns is a complex one to say the least
and it is presented here in a style that pulls no punches. Indeed, Being Flynn is much more difficult to
watch that I expected going in. Jonathan Flynn is, for lack of a better,
family-friendly term, a miserable old coot, a holdover from a different time
who has never adjusted to the world around him. On top of his vocal racism and
homophobia, he is thoroughly arrogant in the worst way possible: he’s never
accomplished anything with his life and yet he expects others to treat him as
if he has. In Jonathan’s mind, there have only been three great American
writers and he is one of them, despite never having had a work published. Worse
yet, a life of poor choices and weighty entitlement have only aided in the
speed with which his brain is deteriorating, leading Jonathan to lash out
violently in both word and action. In short, he is an impossible character to
love and even to feel pity for him proves difficult. In the midst of this
stands Nick, torn between the childhood need for a father and the adult reason
that tells him to kick the man to the curb. He simultaneously hates his father
and desires his approval. This dynamic creates a tense, painful atmosphere that
made it a challenge for me to sit still without squirming. To be honest with
you, I’m not sure if that’s a good thing or a bad thing.
On the one hand, it could be argued that director Paul
Weitz’s goal is to stick the viewer squarely in the middle of the awkward and
terse central relationship and force the audience to engage. In this way, Being Flynn is a great success. But on the
other hand, being this close to the fray, so to speak, also forces the viewer to
react to Jonathan in a personal nature. For me, this led to the overwhelming
feeling that Jonathan would deserve whatever fate befell him and stripped me of
any emotional attachment I might have had to his plight. Being Flynn should be relatable to anyone who has ever struggled
with his or her relationship with a parent but instead I found myself
sympathizing some for Nick and feeling nothing beyond “good riddance” for
Jonathan.
That’s a shame, too, because this is without question the
most significant role De Niro has taken on in well over a decade. This might be
his best performance since 1996’s Sleepers
and it is a fantastic, hopeful sight to see him go back to something
worthwhile. Despite nearly 15 years of utter mediocrity, I am still of the
opinion that when given a reason to invest, De Niro is one of the five best
actors in the industry, only he keeps taking awful role after awful role. He
does an excellent job of fully committing to Jonathan, creating a memorable
character, even if it is memorable for being a wretched human. Likewise, Dano
is very good in his role and brings a lot of realism to the part. In the hands
of another director (not necessarily better hands, just different), Being Flynn might have turned into a
showcase piece for Dano, for which I could see a world in which he would garner
award attention. As it is, however, De Niro overshadows him and perhaps this
keeps Dano (and Nick) from reaching his full potential. Being Flynn is an interesting film and one that is almost as tough
to grade as it is to watch. At times it makes a push to point itself toward “great”
but more often than not I felt it floundered despite the best efforts of cast
and crew.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.