Everyone knows the tale of The Three Musketeers and whether you are more familiar with
Alexander Dumas’ literary work or any of the prior cinematic adaptations, you get
the gist of this movie. There’s not much that is new here in the way of story
and if you’ve seen the 1993 Disney movie of the same name starring Keifer
Sutherland, then you should definitely know what to expect from this version.
In fact, this Three Musketeers
appears to be based far more faithfully on the script from 1993 than it is on
Dumas’ novel. At times it plays like a shot-for-shot remake with exceedingly
worse actors in the lead roles. I’m not universally opposed to remakes but I
quite enjoy the ’93 version for what it is and see no reason why it needs to be
updated. This begs the question: Why make this movie in the first place? Ah,
but that brings us to the gimmick! In order to trick the movie up enough to
give it that new car smell, the people behind The Three Musketeers have introduced outlandish technology and
fighting styles to the story! By throwing in Matrix-like special effects and stuff like giant zeppelins that
carry Buckingham to and from England, Paul W.S. Anderson and his team of
writers bring some supposed freshness to an otherwise rehashed vision. Now it’s
a brand new movie that everyone will want to see…in 3D!!!
Now here’s the rub as far as I’m concerned: I’m cool with
a re-imagined take on a classic story. If Anderson and his cronies wanted to
jam-pack the Three Musketeers
narrative with modern technology and hip dialogue, then I would have been fine
with that. (I probably wouldn’t have liked it but I could at least accept it as
a nice try.) But instead of an alternative history-type film, we just get these
random pieces of technology and out-of-place special effects that muddy the
water and basically create an atmosphere in which the film cannot be taken
seriously as either a period piece or a modern re-imagining. Very easily, The Three Musketeers could have been
turned into a steampunk vision of the classic tale and at the very least that
would have been worth trying. As it is, it lacks the balls to reach for anything
other than what it is: thoroughly mediocre, late-night-cable, throw-away
entertainment.
There are some decent moments here and there and
honestly, I expected much worse in the dialogue department. This script really
isn’t half-bad and it would have been enough to make The Three Musketeers at least passable if the cast wasn’t so
lacking in charisma. But just as the concept lacks boldness, the actors are irritatingly
middle-of-the-row. Stevenson, Evans, and Macfayden are all capable actors,
while Waltz can be truly magnificent but here they are all going through the
motions. (To be fair, they are light years ahead of what Lerman brings to the
table. Sheesh. That kid cannot act.) There’s no charm to what they’re doing and
a little charm would have gone a long way in this situation. All of this makes The Three Musketeers a sloppy, heartless
endeavor that serves little purpose other than to fill a blog post during a
slow week.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.